The Transition Opportunity: Investment Signals Across the Transition Stack

Series 1: The Transition Opportunity

The Transition Opportunity is a series that reframes the global transition as a capital allocation opportunity, not a moral imperative. It provides a clear, structured overview of the green economy sectors attracting private and institutional investment, explaining how each sector functions, where value is created, and why capital is flowing unevenly across the transition landscape.

Article 3: Investment Signals Across the Transition Stack

Articles 1 and 2 established the structure of the transition economy and the mechanics by which capital converts into revenue once deployed. The next question for investors is behavioural: how does capital actually move across this system in practice?

By 2025, global energy investment was forecasted to reach approximately US$3.3 trillion, with around US$2.2 trillion directed toward clean energy - a record level and a clear signal that capital has shifted decisively toward low-carbon infrastructure (IEA, 2025; BloombergNEF 2H Trackers). Climate tech venture and growth funding also rose to around US$40.5 billion, indicating sustained investor interest despite higher rates and tighter risk conditions (Sightline Climate, 2026). As Peter Castellas, Founder of the Climate Investor Forum, has observed, the direction of travel remains anchored by the Paris Agreement and is no longer in doubt (UNFCCC, n.d.).

Even at today’s pace, investment remains only around one-third of the US$5.6 trillion required annually between 2025 and 2030 to remain on a net-zero pathway (BloombergNEF, 2025). The constraint is deployability: capital flows unevenly across the transition economy as different sectors emit different investment signals at different stages of maturity.

Reading the Transition Stack Investment Signals

From an investor’s perspective, the transition stack functions as a layered signal system. Upstream policy and trade settings establish conviction and origination signals. Mid-stack industrial pathways determine whether capital can scale. Downstream compliance and demand mechanisms convert intent into revenue certainty. Capital moves sequentially, responding to where risk is priced, absorbed, or transferred at each layer.

Co-designed with Peter Castellas, this article sets out that signal landscape and offers a structured way to interpret how different investor classes — particularly in Australia — deploy capital with confidence in execution and risk-adjusted return.

1. Upstream: Policy and Geopolitics Are Rewriting the Map

Upstream, policy and geopolitics define the operating conditions that determine which transition pathways are financeable, bankable, and durable over time. These signals are read first by investors with the balance sheets, strategic incentives, or mandate flexibility to absorb early uncertainty.

In renewable energy, durable market design and policy stability have historically attracted developers, utilities, and early-stage infrastructure sponsors willing to underwrite development and permitting risk in anticipation of long-dated contracted cash flows (IEA, 2024a). 

By contrast, clean manufacturing and mobility infrastructure tend to attract corporates and strategic operators rather than yield capital, reflecting uncertainty around adoption curves, utilisation rates, and network effects (BloombergNEF, 2025a).

Globally, these dynamics are becoming more pronounced. China deployed approximately US$818 billion in low-carbon investment in 2024 and accounted for around 44% of global renewable investment in the first half of 2025 (BloombergNEF, 2025; World Economic Forum, 2025). 

In parallel, the European Union is operationalising its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), moving from reporting obligations toward financial consequences and reshaping the competitive landscape for emissions-intensive exports and the technologies required to decarbonise them (European Commission, 2025). By contrast, the United States is entering a period of policy retrenchment and uncertainty, reinforcing the premium investors place on jurisdictions offering durable, long-dated policy conviction.

Some of the strongest acceleration signals are emerging outside traditional capital centres. Pakistan’s rooftop solar boom illustrates how rapidly deployment can scale when costs, policy, and demand align (Reuters, 2025; TransitionZero, 2025), signalling future growth corridors rather than isolated case studies.

For Australia, upstream signals represent a strategic opportunity. As regional demand for decarbonisation accelerates, Australia is positioned not only as a domestic transition market, but as a bridge between global integrity standards and regional deployment. Australia’s comparative advantage lies in positioning itself as a regional exporter of transition capability. 

2. Mid-Stack: The “Missing Middle” Where Capital Struggles to Scale

While upstream signals establish direction, the most commercially consequential opportunity sits in the US$20–100 million “missing middle” where proven technologies must industrialise.

Investment patterns increasingly favour later-stage companies with established revenues and operational readiness, while this middle band remains structurally underserved (Sightline Climate, 2026). Infrastructure capital seeks long-dated, contracted cash flows. Large institutions remain constrained by performance benchmarks and allocation limits. The result is a persistent financing gap precisely where emissions intensity is highest.

As Peter Castellas has observed, the core decarbonisation opportunity lies in the industrial base. Cement, steel, alumina, aviation, and agriculture represent the steepest abatement curves, yet offtake certainty, pricing visibility, and scale economics remain insufficient to support conventional project finance. The central investor question in this layer is therefore not how much capital is required, but who absorbs early risk, and under what terms.

This challenge is most acute in sectors where asset economics sit between venture and infrastructure. Circular economy platforms attract private equity, infrastructure-adjacent funds, and strategic operators pursuing scale and consolidation rather than single-asset ownership, reflecting exposure to throughput and commodity risk. Clean manufacturing assets remain concentrated among corporates, specialist growth equity, and blended-finance providers, as uncertainty around offtake and pricing deters bankability. Mobility platforms similarly rely on infrastructure equity and strategic operators willing to absorb utilisation risk and demand uncertainty before yield-oriented capital can enter (Krishnan, M., Bradley, C., Tai, H., Devesa, T., Smit, S. and Pacthod, D.,2024; Sivaprasad, D., Salleh, N., Tan, D. & Pande, V., 2023).

This gap creates space for structured growth equity, private credit, and blended-finance models capable of moving assets from first-of-a-kind deployment to infrastructure-ready scale. Unlocking this phase of the transition requires capital that can absorb early risk, crowd in commercial lenders, and align incentives across producers, offtakers, and policymakers - a role traditional venture and project finance models are not yet designed to play.

3. Downstream: Compliance, Carbon, and Demand Certainty

Downstream, the transition increasingly becomes a question of demand certainty rather than technological feasibility. 

Cost curves across core technologies have shifted materially over the past decade, but compliance mechanisms are now converting policy intent into enforceable investment demand(IEA, 2024; Mercom India, 2024). However, cost alone is rarely sufficient to mobilise long-duration capital at scale.

In Australia, the next decade will be shaped as much by compliance as by price dynamics. Under the reformed Safeguard Mechanism, baselines for more than 200 large facilities decline by 4.9% annually through to 2030, transforming emissions from an ESG consideration into a material and escalating financial liability (EY, 2024; Clean Energy Regulator, 2024; DCCEEW, 2024). Compliance converts policy ambition into legally enforceable demand, creating long-term visibility for abatement investment.

As demand certainty hardens, the investor base shifts. In renewable energy, mature market structures and compliance-driven demand support participation from pension funds, insurers, and long-duration infrastructure investors seeking stable, contracted cash flows. In green buildings and cities, capital is dominated by real estate funds, REITs, and institutional property investors, where decarbonisation increasingly functions as a prerequisite for financing access, valuation resilience, and exit liquidity (PRI, 2024). 

Land and resource-management assets continue to favour patient capital — including family offices, sovereign investors, and specialist long-duration funds — reflecting long time horizons, illiquidity, and sensitivity to regulatory and ecological conditions (UNEP FI, 2024).

This downstream shift is already driving durable demand for industrial decarbonisation technologies, high-integrity Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs), and nature-based carbon projects. Indigenous-led fire management provides a clear illustration. In Northern Australia, early-season cultural burning is generating verified carbon abatement outcomes alongside community-controlled economic benefits, demonstrating how strong governance and local knowledge can underpin both integrity and return (ALFA (NT) Limited). By contrast, biodiversity and climate adaptation remain materially undercapitalised with less than US$8 billion raised globally for resilience and adaptation funds, compared with approximately US$650 billion directed toward decarbonisation - an imbalance that represents both systemic risk and an emerging frontier for capital deployment (McKinsey & Company, 2024; ESG Business, 2024).

Why this matters for éthica capital and GBC Group 

Understanding where a sector sits along this progression is the difference between thematic exposure and executable investment strategy. This signal progression defines how éthica Capital and GBC Group engage across the transition stack.

• Upstream: Policy and trade rules (CBAM, Safeguard, regional ETS) are origination signals - they identify which sectors face mandatory capex and which narratives investors will underwrite. 

• Mid-stack: The $20–100m “missing middle” is where structured capital (equity + hybrids + private credit + blended finance) converts industrial scale-up into bankable transactions. éthica capital and GBC Group specialise in structuring and leading transactions at this inflection point. 

• Downstream: Compliance-driven demand turns decarbonisation into a durable cashflow driver - improving bankability, lowering cost of capital, and expanding the opportunity set for both equity and debt investors. 

Finally, the question of who will finance this transition is becoming clearer. Co-investment pathways are emerging across: 

• Corporate balance sheets, anchoring offtake and de-risking technologies 

• Family offices, increasingly appetite-driven and mission-aligned investors 

• The CEFC, crowding in private finance through catalytic capital and blended-finance structures 

éthica capital sits at the nexus of these pathways. Together with experts like Peter Castellas, we help investors translate narrative momentum into capital allocation - deploying into the parts of the transition where value, integrity and returns converge. 

–
Many of the themes explored in this article will be examined in practice at the Pre-UN COP Climate Investor Forum 2025, founded by Peter Castellas. The Forum convenes investors, policymakers and practitioners to focus on the capital, governance and industrial pathways required to deliver the transition at scale. 

Chloé Argyle, Managing Director of éthica capital will be speaking at the Forum, which will be held 17-18 February 2026 at Centrepiece, Melbourne. 

Further details: www.climateinvestorforum.com

éthica capital, Green Bond Corporation SARL (GBC), and Carbon Capital Corporation (CCC) form part of The Green Bond Corporation Group (GBC Group), bringing together capabilities across sustainable finance, infrastructure, and carbon-based financing.

‍

Citations:

ALFA (NT) Limited (2026) About Us, Arnhem Land Fire Abatement Northern Territory. Available at: https://www.alfant.com.au/about-us (accessed: 12 January 2026)

BloombergNEF (2025a) Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025. Bloomberg Finance L.P. Available at: https://about.bnef.com/insights/finance/energy-transition-investment-trends (accessed: 12 January 2026)

BloombergNEF (2025) Energy Transition Trends 2025 (abridged). Available at: https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/951623_BNEF-Energy-Transition-Trends-2025-Abridged.pdf (accessed: 18 December 2025).

BloombergNEF (2025) Global investment in the energy transition exceeded $2 trillion for the first time in 2024. Available at: https://about.bnef.com/insights/finance/global-investment-in-the-energy-transition-exceeded-2-trillion-for-the-first-time-in-2024-according-to-bloombergnef-report (accessed: 18 December 2025). 

Clean Energy Regulator (2024) Safeguard mechanism baselines. Available at: https://cer.gov.au/schemes/safeguard-mechanism/safeguard-baselines  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Climate Tech VC (2024) 30bn and 14% fall as market finds new normal in 2024. Available at: https://www.ctvc.co/30bn-and-14-fall-as-market-finds-new-normal-in-24;(accessed: 18 December 2025).

Climate Tech VC (2024) Your 2025 climate tech oracle results. Available at:https://www.ctvc.co/your-2025-climate-tech-oracle-results-2 (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Council on Foreign Relations (2022) How the Inflation Reduction Act will help the United States lead the clean energy economy, CFR.org, 19 September. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/blog/how-inflation-reduction-act-will-help-united-states-lead-clean-energy-economy (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Dealroom (2024) Climate tech: global ecosystem overview. Available at:  https://dealroom.co/guides/climate-tech (accessed: 18 December 2025). 

Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) (2024) Safeguard mechanism overview. Available at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reporting/national-greenhouse-energy-reporting-scheme/safeguard-mechanism/overview  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

ESG Business (2024) Private capital faces $1 trillion opportunity amid demand for climate resilience technology. Available at: https://esgbusiness.com/in-focus/private-capital-faces-1t-opportunity-amidst-demand-climate-resilience-tech  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

European Commission (2025) Officially published simplifications of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Available at: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/news/officially-published-simplifications-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-cbam-2025-10-20_en  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

EY (2024) Australia’s safeguard mechanism: policy outlook. Available at: https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-au/insights/sustainability/documents/ey-safeguard-mechanism-pov-report-final.pdf (accessed: 18 December 2025).

ICAP (2024) Emissions trading worldwide: ETS map factsheet. Available at: https://icapcarbonaction.com/system/files/ets_pdfs/icap-etsmap-factsheet-128.pdf  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024a) Batteries and secure energy transitions: Executive summary. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/batteries-and-secure-energy-transitions/executive-summary  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

IEA (2024b) World Energy Investment 2024. Paris: IEA. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024 (Accessed: 27 January 2026).

IEA (2024c) Status of battery demand and supply. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/batteries-and-secure-energy-transitions/status-of-battery-demand-and-supply  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Krishnan, M., Bradley, C., Tai, H., Devesa, T., Smit, S. and Pacthod, D. (2024) The hard stuff: Navigating the physical realities of the energy transition. McKinsey Global Institute. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/the-hard-stuff-navigating-the-physical-realities-of-the-energy-transition (Accessed: 27 January 2026).

McKinsey & Company (2024) Climate resilience technology: an inflection point for new investment. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/climate-resilience-technology-an-inflection-point-for-new-investment (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Mercom India (2024) Energy storage must expand six-fold to enable renewables. Available at: https://www.mercomindia.com/energy-storage-must-expand-six-fold-enable-renewables  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

OECD (2023), OECD work in support of industrial decarbonisation, OECD Publishing, Paris, December 2023. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/12/oecd-work-in-support-of-industrial-decarbonisation_00ea119a/cd589e4f-en.pdf (Accessed: 27 January 2026).

OilPrice (2025) Korea’s coal phaseout could trigger a seismic shift in Asian energy trade. Available at: https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Koreas-Coal-Phaseout-Could-Trigger-a-Seismic-Shift-in-Asian-Energy-Trade.html  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

PRI Association Limited (2024) PRI Reporting Framework: Infrastructure. January 2024. Available at: https://www.unpri.org/reporting-and-assessment/reporting-frameworks/infrastructure-reporting-framework (Accessed: 27 January 2026).

Powering Past Coal Alliance (2025) Republic of Korea joins the Powering Past Coal Alliance at COP. Available at: https://poweringpastcoal.org/news/republic-of-korea-and-bahrain-join-the-powering-past-coal-alliance-at-cop30/ (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Reuters (2025) Pakistan’s solar surge lifts it into rarefied 25% club. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/pakistans-solar-surge-lifts-it-into-rarefied-25-club-2025-06-17/ (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Sightline Climate (2026) $40.5bn and 8% uptick as power demand drives ’25 investment. Sightline Climate, 6 January. Available at: https://www.sightlineclimate.com/research/40-5bn-and-8-uptick-as-power-demand-drives-25-investment (accessed: 11 January, 2026)

TransitionZero (2025) Shedding light on Pakistan’s distributed solar revolution. Available at: https://www.transitionzero.org/shedding-light-on-pakistans-distributed-solar-revolution  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (n.d.) The Paris Agreement. Available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement (accessed: 18 December 2025).

United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) (n.d.) Publications. Available at: https://www.unepfi.org/category/publications/ (Accessed: 27 January 2026).

World Economic Forum (2025) Fostering effective energy transition 2025. Available at: https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Fostering_Effective_Energy_Transition_2025.pdf  (accessed: 18 December 2025).

Sivaprasad, D., Salleh, N., Tan, D. & Pande, V. (2023). How national-level blended finance can catalyse the climate transition in emerging markets. World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/10/blended-finance-climate-transition-emerging-markets/ (Accessed: 27 January 2026)

‍